FEATURES

Representative or Constituency Based Governance

 

As elected members from the association, the Board of Directors, Commissioners and Elections Council members are often surprised to learn during governance orientation that AAMFT is oriented toward representative governance and less toward constituency based governance. What’s the difference? A constituency-based model is typically viewed as one where elected officials consider “constituents” when making decisions. Typical constituency models might include geography or population groups.

Representative governance involves elected officials acting as representatives for a specific mission or purpose. For example, the AAMFT Board of Directors must follow duties of care, loyalty and obedience to the Corporation. Directors represent the corporate needs. Typically, the primary corporate need is fiduciary. In short, the board must operate with the focus on the Corporation being managed in a fiscally responsible manner while working toward goals and objectives in the strategic plan.

Commissioners of the COAMFTE represent the interests of the public who are enrolled or will be enrolled in COAMFTE accredited programs. The mission statement clearly reflects this representation: “COAMFTE’s mission is to promote best practices for Marriage and Family Therapy educational programs through the establishment, review and revision of accreditation standards and policies, and the accreditation of graduate and post-graduate educational programs.” This mission has the sole purpose of protecting those in the public pursuing family therapy education within COAMFTE accredited programs.

The board must operate with the focus on the Corporation being managed in a fiscally responsible manner while working toward goals and objectives in the strategic plan.

Elections Council members are elected to represent the integrity of the elections process through the careful vetting of nominees. The Elections Council needs to balance many variables when carefully putting together the ballot and therefore represent the corporation, members, and elections process.

Understanding these differences in governance helps potential candidates determine what elected position to possibly run for, as well as being clear about the role expectations of that position. We hope you will consider running for an elected position!


Other articles

Gray Divorce: Splitting Up Later in Life

Representative Governance

In the last article, CEO Tracy Todd highlighted the distinctions between constituency based and representative governance. Here, I will expand on the board’s role as a representative of AAMFT.
Timothy F. Dwyer, PhD, President

Meaning of Aging in a Time of Crisis

The Performance Evaluation Committee

AAMFT conducts an annual governance orientation for newly elected AAMFT board, elections council, and commissioners. CEO Tracy Todd, president-elect Shelley A. Hanson, and I led the intensive two-day orientation.
Timothy F. Dwyer, PhD, President

Gray Divorce: Splitting Up Later in Life

Diversity and Inclusivity Policy

Emerging from recommendations of the Diversity and Inclusivity Steering Committee (DISC) in 2018 and board approved policies in early 2019, there are two essential aspects of this policy. One is related to our D&I commitment, the second is our D&I accountability.
Timothy F. Dwyer, PhD, President