After a divorce or separation, clients can feel as though everything is a fight. It isn’t that they are high-conflict people. More often, they have developed a pattern of communication in which conflict is expected before the conversation even begins. Now add the complexities of a second relationship and additional children, and the dynamics of any household can become truly complicated.
A scheduling disagreement turns into a fight over loyalty, or a school or medical decision becomes a power struggle. It can begin to feel as though even minor decisions escalate into major standoffs.
Blended families have additional challenges: co-parents with emotional histories, children trying to balance households, and bonus parents (I’ll use this term instead of stepparent throughout this article) who are trying to find their footing. As a family law mediator, I find that the failure to achieve peaceful (or at least civil) communication isn’t due to any one person, but to the communication patterns that have developed.
Over time, emotional reactivity becomes part of the structure itself. Responses are driven less by the issue at hand and more by the need to defend one’s role, sense of control, or place in the family. However, like any other habit, it can change.
What counts as high-conflict communication?
The term “high conflict” can be subjective. What one person classifies as high conflict may be someone else’s “slightly upset.” I tend to think of it as a pattern of action. Here are some key things I look out for in my practice:
- Personalizing neutral issues
- Rewriting or exaggerating past arguments
- Using children as messengers to manipulate emotions
- Escalating their tone or volume whenever questioned
When these patterns occur consistently, we focus on addressing the communication cycle that fuels the conflict.
It is important to distinguish a true high-conflict” individual from someone who merely may not agree or is just difficult to communicate with. In blended families, we see conflict arising most often when an individual feels their role in the family is threatened. For example, a bonus parent who steps into an active role in the child’s life.
The blended family dynamic: Why It’s uniquely sensitive
A blended family dynamic can be immensely more complicated. Not only are there the typical challenges of the original co-parents, but there is also the additional balancing act of managing the relationships of bonus parents and possibly additional children to consider.
Even in the best co-parenting relationships, there is a history of conflict. After a divorce, it is common for the two parties to harbor unresolved resentment or grief. The process itself can be conflict-inducing, on top of the reasons they ended up divorced. Each parent may have narratives about their marriage and what happened, and may hold significant anger toward that spouse, which can spill into a co-parenting relationship if not properly addressed.
While the addition of an active and involved bonus parent can be immensely beneficial for children, it can also complicate the already complex nature of co-parenting. The bonus parent is put in an almost impossible position, balancing the role of supporting one parent while trying not to overstep their role. The conflict between the two co-parents can create a very negative, stressful environment, while the bonus parent often feels powerless to help resolve this dynamic, which has a significant impact on their daily life.
Children are caught in the middle, either trying to quell the conflict or acting out as an outward expression of the stress and tension they feel in any household they stay in. Many kids internalize the conflict as something they are causing, lowering their self-esteem and questioning their own identity, role, and value to the family.
This shows up in ways that aren’t always obvious. For example, a child who becomes a people-pleaser, monitoring the mood of every adult in the room. More commonly, a child who suddenly withdraws, refuses to talk about one household while in the other, or begins struggling in school may be signaling that the conflict has outgrown their ability to cope.
Blended-family conflict can have significant emotional consequences for everyone involved. The good news is you can help your clients change this dynamic to be supportive and positive co-parents, focused on stability for their children. As a mediator, I see that the key is to ensure that the right communication structures are in place.
The most common communication mistakes
Before we discuss how to communicate effectively, it is important to identify some common mistakes blended families often make. These mistakes may be an attempt to quell conflict or resolve past issues, but they end up sparking debate and exacerbating these negative patterns.
Mistake 1: Using the child as a messenger
When clients are in the midst of conflict, they may try to avoid any contact with the other parent. It can be tempting to send messages through their child between pickups and drop-offs. While often well-intentioned, it can be immensely harmful to the child, placing them in the middle and making them bear the brunt of the other parent’s negative reactions.
Mistake 2: Litigating the past in present conversations
During discussions about the present or future, clients will often revisit past arguments. Rehashing details about the divorce, past disagreements, or previous conflicts does nothing to shift the future towards understanding. Instead, it shifts the conversation towards one party trying to feel validated and often triggers defensiveness from the other side.
Mistake 3: Competing for moral superiority
There is no award in a family for the best parent. It isn’t a competition, but any parents will treat it like one. There will never be a winner, and the losing party will always be the child(ren). Sometimes, both sides need this reminder not to treat co-parenting like a competition.
Mistake 4: Reacting to tone instead of content
Encourage your clients not to frame communication in terms of emotion. Instead, they should look at the content and ask themselves what the message is, not what they infer it could be. If they aren’t sure, they should ask the other party to clarify their meaning. When they prioritize resolution and understanding over reactivity, they will start to be able to relax when the other parent talks to them
Practical tips to help everyone feel heard
“Feeling heard” is often the goal when communicating with members of a blended family, but validation techniques can backfire if not approached correctly. When one party feels you are validating everyone, they may feel you are validating no one. In families where there are genuine power imbalances, harmful behavior, or long-standing manipulation, prioritizing every voice equally can unintentionally normalize dysfunction.
With that in mind, the following principles aren’t about making everyone happy — they’re about changing the conditions that make conflict the default.
1. Separate logistics from emotion
When it comes to raising children, emotions already run high in the most stable of situations. However, when you are navigating a high-conflict situation with your client, you should deploy one of the simplest and most effective methods: containment.
You will want to work with them to help streamline communication and stick to objective goals, like schedules or tasks. Suggest designating one platform or co-parenting tool, such as OurFamilyWizard or TalkingParents, as the sole channel for exchanging information. No commentary, no working through past grievances, just simply checking off logistical tasks and needs to get things done. When they separate the calendar from their emotions, they will immediately lower the temperature of the exchange. Many of these co-parenting tools also contain a tone meter that helps the co-parent see in real time how their tone may be perceived.
2. Clarify roles explicitly
When you have additional bonus parents that play a large role in the child’s life, clarifying roles and responsibilities becomes even more important.
- Who makes medical decisions?
- What authority does a bonus parent have to discipline?
- At what point should the other household be notified of behavior or events?
Bonus parents are placed in a difficult position; they can be left out or ridiculed when it comes to conversations about relationship structure. Most advice on co-parenting centers on the biological parents, leaving bonus parents in a state of ambiguity. Including them in the solution of navigating roles will help everyone understand how they fit into the family dynamic, eliminating resentment from both sides.
Children are also trying to understand the roles, responsibilities, and expectations of each household. When everyone works together to clearly lay out everyone’s role, it puts them at ease.
High-conflict communication exaggerates, escalates, and globalizes a disagreement rather than containing it.
3. Use containment language
Many co-parents have experienced a disagreement that started with something small and escalated into a full-blown conflict over a very large issue, and neither party can remember how they arrived there. John and Julie Gottman refer to this as “Kitchen Sinking,” a communication pattern where one partner brings up multiple grievances or issues during a single conversation, and this pattern can continue with co-parents (Gottman & Silver, 1999). High-conflict communication exaggerates, escalates, and globalizes a disagreement rather than containing it.
Co-parents can reframe and narrow the focus of frustration. Instead of, “You never respect my time,” They could replace it with, “When last-minute changes happen like today, it makes it difficult to accomplish what I need to. Can we agree on a 24-hour notice policy?”
4. Shift The goal from “being right” to “creating stability.”
In blended families, there is often an instinct to leap to defensiveness. Parenting is one of the most emotional roles we have in our lives. We can feel very vulnerable when we perceive an attack on who we are as a parent. However, in blended families, we need to override this defensiveness to solve problems that arise.
Before responding, help your client ask themselves:
“Will this help my child feel safer and more secure?”
“Will this help create clarity?”
“Am I sending this message to prove that I’m correct or communicate an objective need?”
Everyone involved has the right to their perspective, but that doesn’t mean their opinion will or should drive the outcome. The goal should always be to create a stable and predictable environment for the children involved.
When conflict persists: Structured intervention
If you are finding that your client is still struggling, it is normal. Some blended families need more legal support to provide structure for their communication and parenting time. In mediation, we typically begin by identifying the specific communication patterns that trigger escalation—not by relitigating the history, but by mapping where things break down in real time.
From there, we work on building agreements: how information is shared, who is involved in which decisions, and what the process looks like when a new disagreement arises. Many families find that a written communication plan removes the ambiguity that breeds conflict. When everyone knows the rules of engagement in advance, there is less room for things to spiral. Blended family mediation includes the new bonus parents in the conversation because they, too, are an important part of the child’s future.
It is important to emphasize that struggling through a period of high conflict doesn’t mean the family is broken. It means the system needs structure and support.
What it actually takes to make it work
In blended families, “feeling heard” is not the same as getting your way, and it doesn’t mean every perspective carries equal weight in every decision. What it does mean is that communication stays focused on solutions rather than scorekeeping.
Children don’t need perfection; they need predictability and emotional safety. Every adult in their lives holds real power to help create that—through patience, intentional communication, and thoughtful planning. Helping your clients to self-regulate before they respond isn’t something that comes naturally to most people, but it may be the single most important skill you can help them develop on the path to a more peaceful blended family.
Amanda D. Singer, Esq., MDR, CDFA®, is a professional family mediator and founder of West Coast Family Mediation. She is a California-licensed attorney and Certified Divorce Financial Analyst. Singer leads West Coast Family Mediation’s team of mediators working with clients throughout California to help families improve communication, solve problems, and reach agreements while staying out of court.
Other articles
Special to This Issues
Systemic Training in an Era of Anti-DEI Policies: Utilizing Three Systemic Pillars to Guide CFT Program Governance
Recent actions have affected DEI practices in higher education, with the February 14, 2025, Dear Colleague Letter (U.S. Department of Education, 2025) increasing scrutiny and causing uncertainty for programs focused on inclusion. Some departments face program threats, while others and institutions experience system-wide anxiety.
Mary R. Nedela, PhD, M. Evan Thomas, PhD, Deneisha Scott-Poe, PhD, & Sarah Powers, EdD
Systemic World
When the Homeland Is on a Screen: How Geopolitical Trauma Affects Children in Diaspora Families
At dinner, a father’s hand pauses midair. His phone lights up with a video from a street he once walked as a teenager in Tehran. Smoke fills the frame. Someone is shouting. He leans closer without realizing his daughter is not watching the footage. She is watching his face. In the car after school, a mother lowers the volume on a Farsi news broadcast the moment her son opens the door. She asks about homework in a voice that is just slightly too bright.
Bahareh Sahebi, PsyD
Perspectives
Optimizing MFT Professional Socialization Development: Using the 4C Assessment Model in Supervision
Supervision is a crucial aspect of the development of competent, ethical marriage and family therapy (MFT) professionals providing quality client care in practice.
Tia Crooms, PhD